Bug 1715193
| Summary: | Need nsswitch support for /etc/subuid and /etc/subgid content | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Daniel Walsh <dwalsh> | ||||
| Component: | glibc | Assignee: | Carlos O'Donell <codonell> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-tools-bugs | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 8.2 | CC: | ashankar, bbaude, bugzilla-redhat, codonell, dj, fhirtz, fweimer, gscrivan, mheon, mnewsome, pfrankli, rbeyel, smccarty | ||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Triaged | ||||
| Target Release: | 8.0 | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | |||||||
| : | 1715195 (view as bug list) | Environment: | |||||
| Last Closed: | 2020-01-21 14:23:13 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | 1715195 | ||||||
| Bug Blocks: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Daniel Walsh
2019-05-29 19:24:21 UTC
Created attachment 1626792 [details]
Proposal for adding subuid and subgid to nsswitch
I added the text, I attempted to update the Wiki, but it would not allow me to edit a new page. (In reply to Daniel Walsh from comment #6) > I added the text, I attempted to update the Wiki, but it would not allow me > to edit a new page. I missed this comment. Are you talking about the glibc wiki? Please have a look at this: https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/EditorGroup Your account will be deleted if you didn't get added to EditorGroup in a timely fashion, so you may need to recreate your account. I've commented on this upstream again, summarizing the past comments and adding my own reflection on the design direction: https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/issues/154#issuecomment-571415244 Next week I'm going to close this issue as CLOSED/UPSTREAM, as something we can track upstream. RHEL would inherit a choice made and designed upstream. We would reopen a new bug to backport a solution from upstream (which may not be in glibc). |