Bug 1715936
Summary: | Review Request: bodhi3 - The bodhi3 client for Fedora 29 and 30 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Randy Barlow <rbarlow> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | mhroncok, package-review, zbyszek |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | zbyszek:
fedora-review+
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-06-12 00:45:50 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Randy Barlow
2019-05-31 17:07:18 UTC
The %descriptions needs to say that this is a compat package and explain when it should be used (and that it cannot be used with Fedora infra now). %{__install} → install (applies to the normal bodhi spec too). - builds and installs OK in mock - not latest version, but that's expected - package name is OK (follows https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple). Package is APPROVED. Please update the %descriptions when importing. I consider the following three lines suspicious: %{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-bodhi} %{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-bodhi-client} Requires: python3-bodhi == %{version}-%{release} (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bodhi3 I've adjusted the main Bodhi package to use install instead of the install macro here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bodhi/c/66783a1c7f5dc1d3c01671ef1ae5557147fe8766?branch=master And here are commits I made to the bodhi3 package to address feedback from both of you (let me know if you would like further improvements, or if I missed anything): https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bodhi3/c/9bc0d164f6552d01799483c539c5c1490925ce50?branch=f30 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bodhi3/c/fbb83784385cc6045b7b7536131e503e639845a7?branch=f30 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bodhi3/c/d5aa252633a31ab204df0b5fee65b4d9d3733ddc?branch=f30 I don't intend to make a rawhide build, so I haven't made any commits on master. I'm not tooooootally sure how retiring works, so I'm making myself a TODO to retire it after the f29 and f30 updates that have this package go stable, just so I can be sure nothing funny happens (i.e., I want to make sure there are builds tagged for stable in the stable releases first, just in case the releng retirement script blocks f29/30 if it detects there aren't builds there.) I will also put this in the same updates that introduce Bodhi 4 so they go out atomically. I just noticed something that I hadn't considered before - the F29 package still has Python 2 (but F30 does not). F29 also has an even older Bodhi (3.12 instead of 3.14). All that to say, the f29 spec file will be a bit different than this one. I will do F30 first and then work on F29. I will make the bodhi3 package be 3.12 (so it's the same version) and support those python2- packages too, even though that will make Miro a little bit sad. Sorry Miro. Let me know if you want to review that too or not - I can do it via a PR if you do. If I don't hear from either of you, I'll assume you don't want to review it ☺ I don't need to review anything, but if you'd like another set of eyes, feel free to cc me on the PR. As for the Python 2 bits, I only really care for rawhide. FEDORA-2019-352078fd2b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-352078fd2b Here is my commit for F29: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bodhi3/c/2d00cdba43dfe13cda171e2c75003a384c9350f6?branch=f29 Note that I kept using the python2-bodhi name for the Python 2 packages rather than calling them python3-bodhi3. This way they are the same content we offer now, and they don't conflict with the official Bodhi package, since it offers no Python 2 packages at all (Bodhi 4 does not support Python 2). FEDORA-2019-5ce9adadc1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5ce9adadc1 bodhi-4.0.2-1.fc30, bodhi3-3.14.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-352078fd2b bodhi-4.0.2-1.fc29, bodhi3-3.12.0-200.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5ce9adadc1 bodhi-4.0.2-1.fc30, bodhi3-3.14.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. bodhi-4.0.2-1.fc29, bodhi3-3.12.0-200.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |