Bug 171900

Summary: CVE-2005-2975 Multiple XPM processing issues (CVE-2005-2976)
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Josh Bressers <bressers>
Component: gdk-pixbufAssignee: Matthias Clasen <mclasen>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.0CC: security-response-team
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: reported=20051027,embargo=20051115,impact=important,source=vendorsec
Fixed In Version: RHSA-2005-810 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-11-15 14:28:09 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch for the integer overflow
none
Fix for the large color DoS none

Description Josh Bressers 2005-10-27 16:49:29 UTC 
These issues were reported by Ludwig Nussel of Suse.

When gdk-pixbuf processes a bad XPM file, it fails to verify that width * height
* colors doesn't cause an integer overflow.

Additionally gdk-pixbuf will enter an infinite loop if the number of colors
provided is very large, but not large enough to cause an integer overflow.
Comment 1 Josh Bressers 2005-10-27 16:50:10 UTC 
These issues should also affect RHEL2.1 and RHEL3.
Comment 2 Josh Bressers 2005-10-27 16:50:53 UTC 
Created attachment 120473 [details]
Patch for the integer overflow
Comment 3 Josh Bressers 2005-10-27 16:51:56 UTC 
Created attachment 120474 [details]
Fix for the large color DoS
Comment 7 Josh Bressers 2005-11-15 14:10:55 UTC 
Lifting embargo
Comment 8 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-11-15 14:28:09 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-810.html