Bug 1719328

Summary:	missing a11y names
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8	Reporter:	Jiri Prajzner <jprajzne>
Component:	evince	Assignee:	Marek Kašík <mkasik>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	8.1	CC:	tpelka
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	8.0
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	evince-3.28.4-5.el8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-11-04 02:41:10 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jiri Prajzner 2019-06-11 14:09:17 UTC

Description of problem:
evince is missing a11y names for some of its components

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.28.4

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. open pdf in evince and at-spi/sniff
2. navigate to "annotate the document" in sniff
3.

Actual results:
missing a11y name

Expected results:
valid, descriptive a11y name

Additional info:
same for toolbar with 'add text annotation' and this item itself, as well as 'add highlight annotation' etc.

Comment 1 Marek Kašík 2019-08-26 15:55:06 UTC

Hi,

I've created upstream merge request which fixes this:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evince/merge_requests/186

I'll wait until it is accepted, translated and released before I'll push it to Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 2 Jiri Prajzner 2019-08-27 07:23:18 UTC

thanks Marek! :)

Comment 3 Marek Kašík 2020-03-05 17:06:30 UTC

This has been merged upstream so devel_ack+.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2020-11-04 02:41:10 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (evince bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:4651