Bug 171969
| Summary: | -devel subpkg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
| Component: | gcl | Assignee: | Gérard Milmeister <gemi> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | extras-qa |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2005-10-28 18:27:57 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
(In reply to comment #0) > rpmlint suggests following files could/should be packaged in a -devel subpkg: > > %files devel > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %{_libdir}/gcl-%{version}/h/ > %{_libdir}/gcl-%{version}/unixport/lib*.a > > Assuming, of course, you don't think this is a hairbrained idea... (-: We could do this, I would prefer not to, unless we know exactly what should go into the devel package. I consider gcl a development package itself, so the problem isn't one :-) > BTW, any reason gcl hasn't been built on/for development/fc5 yet? Just tried again to build on fc5: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/319-gcl-2.6.7-4.fc5/i386/build.log If you come up with a patch, please go ahead! BTW, I implemented the same personality hack as in sbcl. In any case, we should communicate with upstream to make gcl compiler better. I don't think it is a high priority though, as we have already clisp and sbcl. > I consider gcl a development package itself Good point, nevermind. > In any case, we should communicate with upstream to make gcl compiler better. Yeah, at least let them know compiling fails with gcc-4.0.2 (assuming it's a gcc and not a glibc thing). |
rpmlint suggests following files could/should be packaged in a -devel subpkg: %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_libdir}/gcl-%{version}/h/ %{_libdir}/gcl-%{version}/unixport/lib*.a Assuming, of course, you don't think this is a hairbrained idea... (-: BTW, any reason gcl hasn't been built on/for development/fc5 yet?