Bug 1728420
| Summary: | Add httpd LimitNOFILE setting or default file configuration during installation. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Mike McCune <mmccune> |
| Component: | Installer | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Devendra Singh <desingh> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | Unspecified | CC: | ehelms, ekohlvan, mvanderw, ngupta, zhunting |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Performance, Triaged |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-08-10 21:37:00 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Mike McCune
2019-07-09 23:34:01 UTC
It would be helpful to know why we have this limit. There are multiple applications running. If it's because of Katello itself, then we don't need to apply it on the Foreman Proxy for example. It also goes the other way around if it's because of Pulp. When we move from Passenger to Puma + reverse proxy it would also impact how we apply this limit. For the qpid/router tuning: This is purely for the combination of Candlepin + Katello + Pulp and all the connected katello-agents combined usage of the QPID infrastructure. I don't think the shift to Puma would have any effect on qpid's resource use. For httpd, shifting to Puma may eliminate the need for this and I'd consider holding off on this specific installer tuning until we get to Puma. (In reply to Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden from comment #3) > It would be helpful to know why we have this limit. There are multiple > applications running. If it's because of Katello itself, then we don't need > to apply it on the Foreman Proxy for example. It also goes the other way > around if it's because of Pulp. When we move from Passenger to Puma + > reverse proxy it would also impact how we apply this limit. The change from mod_passenger to Puma landed in 6.9. In 6.10 Pulp 3 will land which switches from mod_wsgi to a standalone gunicorn setup. I do believe this will remove the need for tuning this since then there will be a lot less file handles open. It should be noted that upstream has already dropped Pulp 2 and mod_passenger support. Upon review of our valid but aging backlog the Satellite Team has concluded that this Bugzilla does not meet the criteria for a resolution in the near term, and are planning to close in a month. This message may be a repeat of a previous update and the bug is again being considered to be closed. If you have any concerns about this, please contact your Red Hat Account team. Thank you. Thank you for your interest in Red Hat Satellite. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this feel free to contact your Red Hat Account Team. Thank you. |