Bug 1729004
Summary: | make clearing NEEDINFO on specific person easier | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] Bugzilla | Reporter: | Zdenek Dohnal <zdohnal> |
Component: | Bugzilla General | Assignee: | Jeff Fearn 🐞 <jfearn> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Lianghui Yu <liyu> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.0 | CC: | bzhang, liyu, mosvald, qgong |
Target Milestone: | 5.0-RH8 | Keywords: | RFE |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 5.0.4-rh33 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-11-11 00:18:12 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Zdenek Dohnal
2019-07-11 07:52:07 UTC
I'm going to take a different approach to solving this. I think it's most usual that person will either be providing their own or all, the third less likely use case can edit the flags directly. IMO The drop down will be annoying in most cases where you just want to select either yourself or all. I'll add another check box: I am providing the information requested of me (Will clear your needinfo request). Or I might think up better text before I implement it :) (In reply to Jeff Fearn 🐞 from comment #1) > I'm going to take a different approach to solving this. I think it's most > usual that person will either be providing their own or all, the third less > likely use case can edit the flags directly. Yes, you're right, it is not so common use case with third person clearing NEEDINFO set on you. I imagined the use case e.g. when you are on PTO and someone sets urgent NEEDINFO on you and you have a colleague who's your backup. So he will answer and want to erase NEEDINFO on you. But there are more cons to it, I suppose... so the current way of things is acceptable to this use case > IMO The drop down will be > annoying in most cases where you just want to select either yourself or all. > > I'll add another check box: > > I am providing the information requested of me (Will clear your needinfo > request). Sounds good! Thank you! > > Or I might think up better text before I implement it :) Verified on latest QE environment, Cleaning all flag or "clean flag for myself" is working as expected Result: PASS This change is now live. If there are any issues, do not reopen this bug. Instead, you should create a new bug and reference this bug. |