Bug 1729170
Summary: | On Fedora Rawhide, the varnish module does not have the default stream and profile set. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Lukas Ruzicka <lruzicka> |
Component: | varnish | Assignee: | Ingvar Hagelund <ingvar> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 31 | CC: | ingvar, luhliari, sgallagh |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-04-16 12:45:17 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Lukas Ruzicka
2019-07-11 13:36:03 UTC
Default streams are no longer required, but default profiles are. Please, for every stream set a default profile. Thank you. The yaml file shows that common is the default profile. I will check if it is correct in future composes. The varnish module still does not correspond to the yaml file in fedora-module-defaults. In the latest compose, it is defined as: === Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:05 ago on Wed 31 Jul 2019 05:02:07 PM CEST. Fedora - Modular Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release Name Stream Profiles Summary varnish 6 default Varnish HTTP cache Hint: [d]efault, [e]nabled, [x]disabled, [i]nstalled === but the yaml file looks like this: === document: modulemd-defaults version: 1 data: module: varnish profiles: 6: [common] === This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle. Changing version to '31'. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle. Changing version to 31. Lukas, It looks like it may have been displaying cached data. Can you run `dnf clean all` and retry? I can confirm that the correct default definition is present in https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/31/Modular/x86_64/repodata/57e36707b6ccbe1540b7d61393c0c6fddc22fcf30acb7c2d1d613be71ea1fb03-modules.yaml.gz If it's still not displaying properly, there's a bug in DNF and this should be reassigned to that team. I believe that this has become irrelevant. I am sorry for the late reaction, discovered this just now. |