Bug 1729188
Summary: | freeipa-healthcheck: /var/log/ipa/healthcheck not owned + ipa-healthcheck.sh installation path is wrong | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | François Cami <fcami> |
Component: | ipa-healthcheck | Assignee: | IPA Maintainers <ipa-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | ipa-qe <ipa-qe> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 8.1 | CC: | abokovoy, cheimes, extras-qa, fdc, ksiddiqu, mkosek, pvoborni, rcritten, sumenon, twoerner |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | 8.1 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | ipa-healthcheck-0.2-4.el8 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1729186 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2019-11-05 20:53:20 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1729186 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Comment 2
Alexander Bokovoy
2019-07-16 07:16:25 UTC
Observations on [root@master healthcheck]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.1 Beta (Ootpa) [root@master healthcheck]# rpm -q ipa-server ipa-healthcheck ipa-server-4.8.0-6.module+el8.1.0+3869+84a20141.x86_64 ipa-healthcheck-0.3-1.module+el8.1.0+3831+93d5a18c.noarch 1. ipa-healthcheck.sh is installed in /usr/libexec/ipa/ 2. [root@master ipa]# ls -l /var/log/ipa total 4 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 Jul 31 11:39 healthcheck [root@master ~]# rpm -qf /var/log/ipa/healthcheck/ ipa-healthcheck-0.3-1.module+el8.1.0+3831+93d5a18c.noarch Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3348 |