| Summary: | switch from langpacks to langpacks-core | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Parag Nemade <pnemade> |
| Component: | glibc | Assignee: | Carlos O'Donell <codonell> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 31 | CC: | aoliva, arjun.is, codonell, dj, fweimer, law, mfabian, petersen, pfrankli, rth, siddhesh |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | glibc-2.30-5.fc31 glibc-2.30.9000-8.fc32 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-09-28 00:03:07 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Parag Nemade
2019-07-15 14:01:22 UTC
Can I request glibc package maintainers to provide their feedback on this request? I do not have an opinion on this change. Would this change here help with bug 1380069 as well? Would it make that fix more difficult. Well, I tried to test this in my copr with new langpacks-2.0 package but looks like glibc-langpack-<langcode> is not getting removed. Will check more on this. (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #2) > I do not have an opinion on this change. To add a little more: further glibc doesn't actually know what meta langpacks packages exist in Fedora. So in this sense it makes more sense to carry the information in langpacks rather than glibc itself. > Would this change here help with bug 1380069 as well? Would it make that > fix more difficult. I don't think it has any affect on that, but maybe 'glibc-langpack' can be simplified anyway. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle. Changing version to 31. We really need changes for langpacks-core-* at the very least for F31. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glibc/pull-request/15 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glibc/pull-request/16 I would still rather we moved this completely to langpacks since that is more consistent. FEDORA-2019-3bf71b86ec has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3bf71b86ec glibc-2.30-5.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3bf71b86ec glibc-2.30-5.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Thanks For F32 we want to move the weak dependencies into the langpacks package. |