Bug 1730280
Summary: | Impossible to retrieve results for large jobs using command line tools | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Beaker | Reporter: | Hubert Kario <hkario> |
Component: | command line | Assignee: | beaker-dev-list |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | tools-bugs <tools-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 26 | CC: | azelinka, bpeck, cbouchar, mastyk, tklohna |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-10-01 17:50:02 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1731115, 1731116 |
Description
Hubert Kario
2019-07-16 11:42:50 UTC
Hello Hubert, I believe we talked about this on the meetup. You are already hitting memory limit on the server, there is very little we can do about it. --- There are two workarounds: 1) Use bkr job-results <Job/Recipe/Task ID> --no-logs which will output the results without log info 2) Use bkr job-results <Recipe/Task ID> which will output info directly for the recipe/task you're asking for You can pipe these two (job-results contains ID as well) and that way you can ask (for example) only for logs for aborted tasks. Yes, I mentioned issues with those tasks on the meetup. No, I didn't hit this specific issue before the meetup. I'm hitting it because I'm using tools like beaker-jobwatch or tcms-results. I don't use `bkr job-results` directly. Then I recommend opening up an issue with them and pointing them to this ticket Hubert, would you mind if I close this? I see that the provided workaround was implemented. I'm sorry for the late reply. Yes, it's fixed now; large jobs are handled correctly now. Thanks! |