Bug 1731321

Summary: Add RHEL-8.0.1 to libosfinfo
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: zhoujunqin <juzhou>
Component: libosinfoAssignee: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 8.1CC: cfergeau, fidencio, mxie, tzheng, xiaodwan, zili
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 8.0   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-07-22 05:22:34 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
screenshot-1 for detecting rhel8.0.1 tree as rhel8.0 product version correctly none

Description zhoujunqin 2019-07-19 05:54:15 UTC 
Description of problem:
Add RHEL-8.0.1 to libosfinfo

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
osinfo-db-20190611-1.el8.noarch
libosinfo-1.5.0-2.el8.x86_64

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. We have RHEL8.0.1 compose:

Compose Path: /mnt/redhat/rhel-8/rel-eng/updates/RHEL-8/RHEL-8.0.1-updates-20190709.0
Compose ID: RHEL-8.0.1-updates-20190709.0
Compose Label: Update-2.0

2. RHEL-8.0.1 isn't listed in osinfo-db

# osinfo-query os |grep rhel8
 rhel8-unknown        | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Unknown                 | 8-unknown | http://redhat.com/rhel/8-unknown        
 rhel8.0              | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0                       | 8.0      | http://redhat.com/rhel/8.0              
 rhel8.1              | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.1                       | 8.1      | http://redhat.com/rhel/8.1              


Actual results:
As above.

Expected results:
Fix it.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Fabiano Fidêncio 2019-07-19 06:09:57 UTC 
zhoujunqin,

We do not plan to have RHEL-8.x.y added and displayed as a different version of RHEL-8.x. So, for instance, RHEL-8.0.1 should be detected as RHEL-8.0 and in case it doesn't happen, then it's a bug.

The reationale for this is that customers would just be interested to know which 8.x release they are running. So far, I don't see a strong reason for changing that and I'd prefer closing this issue as WONTFIX. If, for some reason, it changes in the future and we need to advertise 8.x.y releases, then we can tweak it.

Please, let me know if you agree with the decision of closing the issue as WONTFIX.
Comment 2 zhoujunqin 2019-07-22 02:40:29 UTC 
Hi Fabiano Fidêncio,
Yes, RHEL-8.0.1 is detected as RHEL-8.0 correctly when i try to install a vm with tree http://download.eng.pek2.redhat.com/pub/rhel/rel-eng/updates/RHEL-8/RHEL-8.0.1-updates-20190709.0/compose/BaseOS/x86_64/os/, virt-manager can show version correctly.

Details please see screenshot.

We can close the issue as WONTFIX, thanks.

BR,
juzhou.
Comment 3 zhoujunqin 2019-07-22 02:41:41 UTC 
Created attachment 1592514 [details]
screenshot-1 for detecting rhel8.0.1 tree as rhel8.0 product version correctly
Comment 4 Fabiano Fidêncio 2019-07-22 05:22:34 UTC 
I'm closing the bug then, thanks.