Bug 1731391
Summary: | Trust on does not take effect when vf add to ovs bridge | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux Fast Datapath | Reporter: | liting <tli> |
Component: | DPDK | Assignee: | Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin> |
DPDK sub component: | sriov | QA Contact: | liting <tli> |
Status: | NEW --- | Docs Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | ||
Priority: | unspecified | CC: | ctrautma, jhsiao, maxime.coquelin |
Version: | FDP 19.D | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
liting
2019-07-19 10:10:26 UTC
Hi Li, Are you sure it should work like this? If I understand correctly, in this scenario, the VF is bound to OVS and not to the guest. What is bound to the guest is the Virtio device, so when setting MAC address on eth0 in guest, it sets the MAC address for the Virtio device, not the Intel VF. So I think this behaviour is expected, do you confirm? (In reply to Maxime Coquelin from comment #2) > Hi Li, > > Are you sure it should work like this? > If I understand correctly, in this scenario, the VF is bound to OVS and not > to the guest. > What is bound to the guest is the Virtio device, so when setting MAC address > on eth0 in guest, > it sets the MAC address for the Virtio device, not the Intel VF. > > So I think this behaviour is expected, do you confirm? Hi Maxime, I am testing the nic partitioning feature. NIC partitioning is basically running OVS-DPDK on top of a VF. It need to test trust on function, so I test trust on with this scenario. I am not confirm it should work well. Can you confirm it? or do you know who can confirm it? If above behaviour is expected, I will close the bug and remove this scenario testing. thanks, Li Ting |