Bug 1733173
Summary: | Can't revert the domain to the special snapshot | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advanced Virtualization | Reporter: | Meina Li <meili> |
Component: | libvirt | Assignee: | Peter Krempa <pkrempa> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | yisun |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 8.1 | CC: | chwen, dyuan, fjin, hhan, jgao, lmen, pkrempa, xuzhang, yisun |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Regression, Triaged |
Target Release: | 8.1 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-03-17 18:05:51 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Meina Li
2019-07-25 10:23:53 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 880565 *** Hello, the problem is reproduced on latest libvirt but the error is different Version: libvirt-6.6.0-6.module+el8.3.0+8125+aefcf088.x86_64 qemu-kvm-5.1.0-9.module+el8.3.0+8182+ac9ced32.x86_64 Steps: ➜ ~ virsh list Id Name State ---------------------- 1 new running ➜ ~ virsh snapshot-create-as 1 s1 Domain snapshot s1 created ➜ ~ virsh snapshot-create-as 1 s2 --disk-only Domain snapshot s2 created ➜ ~ virsh snapshot-revert 1 s1 error: operation failed: Failed to load snapshot: Error: Device '' does not have the requested snapshot 's1' ➜ ~ virsh snapshot-list 1 Name Creation Time State --------------------------------------------------- s1 2020-09-21 23:22:43 -0400 running s2 2020-09-21 23:22:53 -0400 disk-snapshot The domain xml: http://paste.openstack.org/raw/798187/ The libvirtd log: http://paste.openstack.org/raw/798188/ Is it a valid scenario to use the internal and external snapshots together? If not, could you please provide a short explanation? It semantically may make sense but there are problems in the current implementation. |