Bug 1733801

Summary: Nonreponsive maintainer check for salimma
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain>
Component: python-hypothesisAssignee: Michel Alexandre Salim <michel>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: i.gnatenko.brain, mhroncok, michel, pingou
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-07-29 04:36:13 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Igor Gnatenko 2019-07-28 18:32:11 UTC
This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for mikeb, following https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/. Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maintain python-hypothesis.

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2019-07-28 22:11:56 UTC
> This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for mikeb

mikeb or salimma?

Note that salimma has recently added me as a co-maintainer of python-hypothesis. Should I prioritize bz1714619?

Comment 2 Igor Gnatenko 2019-07-29 04:36:13 UTC
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #1)
> > This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for mikeb
> 
> mikeb or salimma?

salimma. Sorry for copy-paste.

> Note that salimma has recently added me as a co-maintainer of
> python-hypothesis. Should I prioritize bz1714619?

Would be appreciated. Or add me as co-maintainer and I can handle it.

Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2019-07-29 08:44:21 UTC
Added you and the SIG.