Bug 1734130

Summary:	Content host list: sort order using column "OS" doesn't give expected results.
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Mahesh Yadav <mayadav>
Component:	Hosts - Content	Assignee:	satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Stephen Wadeley <swadeley>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.3.0	CC:	bshahu, pmoravec, rakumar
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	Triaged, UserExperience
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-03-18 19:44:22 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Mahesh Yadav 2019-07-29 17:06:38 UTC

Description of problem:
Content host list: sort order using column "OS" doesn't give expected results.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
This is applicable for Satellite version 6.3  6.4 and even for 6.5

How reproducible:
100% reproducible

Steps to Reproduce:

Satellite Web UI--> Host--> content hosts--> OS column click on OS header.
This should get the host sorted according to their OS version, It is not getting sorted.

Actual results:
Data is not getting sort when we try to click on OS header of the column.

Expected results:
Data should get sort when we try to click on OS header of the column.

Additional info:

Comment 3 Pavel Moravec 2019-08-02 11:27:05 UTC

Sorting by other columns works fine. Just "OS" sorting fails.

Just an idea: can't it be because "OS" is not a katello (content host) attribute, but "only" foreman / Host attribute? While CV/LE/registered_at/name/.. - all other attributes - are also katello attributes? That would explain why scoped search fails to order by something it does not know..?

Comment 5 Mike McCune 2022-01-28 22:30:40 UTC

Upon review of our valid but aging backlog the Satellite Team has concluded that this Bugzilla does not meet the criteria for a resolution in the near term, and are planning to close in a month. This message may be a repeat of a previous update and the bug is again being considered to be closed. If you have any concerns about this, please contact your Red Hat Account team. Thank you.

Comment 6 Mike McCune 2022-03-18 19:44:22 UTC

Thank you for your interest in Red Hat Satellite. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this feel free to contact your Red Hat Account Team. Thank you.