Bug 1734550
| Summary: | GetBucketLocation on non-existing bucket doesn't throw NoSuchBucket and gives 200 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Vikhyat Umrao <vumrao> |
| Component: | RGW | Assignee: | Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | RUDRA PRATAP <rpratap> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3.2 | CC: | assingh, cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, kbader, mbenjamin, rpratap, sbaldwin, sweil, tchandra, tserlin |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | 3.3 | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | RHEL: ceph-12.2.12-1.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_12.2.12-4redhat1xenial | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-08-21 15:11:10 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1725227 | ||
|
Description
Vikhyat Umrao
2019-07-30 20:34:19 UTC
Hi Matt, I was looking into the code which went with this Bug 1705922(https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/26569) and built it with a vstart cluster but looks like it was fixed way before this patch as this is still not backported in upstream luminous - https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/39696. Then I tested this with RHCS 3.3 current build - 12.2.12-40.el7cp and it is working fine with RHCS 3.3(12.2.12) rebase. In fact, it is working fine in 12.2.10 upstream so some fix came in between 12.2.8 to 12.2.10. $ aws s3api get-bucket-location --bucket mybucket1 --endpoint-url http://10.8.129.236:8080 { "LocationConstraint": "us" } $ aws s3api get-bucket-location --bucket mybuc --endpoint-url http://10.8.129.236:8080 An error occurred (NoSuchBucket) when calling the GetBucketLocation operation: Unknown I think we should be able to close this one as RHCS 3.3 CURRENTRELEASE. Thank you, Vikhyat Hi Matt,
RHCS 3.3 , ceph version - 12.2.12-40.el7cp
I tried this on my setup, on a versioned bucket.
While having a bucket present it shows HTTPStatusCode: 200 , and while changing the bucket name to a no existent bucket , it throws an error with "botocore.errorfactory.NoSuchBucket".
Can check the outputs below that i got.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---> non-existing bucket
[root@magna107 ~]# cat 3bg.py
import boto3
access_key = '12345'
secret_key = '67890'
s3_production = boto3.client('s3', endpoint_url='http://magna107:80',
aws_access_key_id = access_key,
aws_secret_access_key = secret_key
)
print(s3_production.get_bucket_location(Bucket='my-bucket'))
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---> output
[root@magna107 ~]# python2 3bg.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "3bg.py", line 10, in <module>
print(s3_production.get_bucket_location(Bucket='my-bucket'))
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/botocore/client.py", line 357, in _api_call
return self._make_api_call(operation_name, kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/botocore/client.py", line 661, in _make_api_call
raise error_class(parsed_response, operation_name)
botocore.errorfactory.NoSuchBucket: An error occurred (NoSuchBucket) when calling the GetBucketLocation operation: Unknown
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---> if the bucket name is changed to an existing bucket..
{'LocationConstraint': None, 'ResponseMetadata': {'HTTPStatusCode': 200, 'RetryAttempts': 0, 'HostId': '', 'RequestId': 'tx00000000000000000002c-005d48188b-a71cf-default', 'HTTPHeaders': {'date': 'Mon, 05 Aug 2019 11:52:43 GMT', 'content-length': '127', 'x-amz-request-id': 'tx00000000000000000002c-005d48188b-a71cf-default'}}}
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me know if you need some more details.
Rudra
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2538 |