Bug 1734558

Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/uberwriter/fedora-30-x86_64/00989814-uberwriter/uberwriter.spec
SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/uberwriter/fedora-30-x86_64/00989814-uberwriter/uberwriter-2.1.5-2.fc30.src.rpm

Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/uberwriter/fedora-30-x86_64/00989876-uberwriter/uberwriter.spec
SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/uberwriter/fedora-30-x86_64/00989876-uberwriter/uberwriter-2.1.5-3.fc30.src.rpm

 - That's a weird place to put translations, see with upstream if they can fix that:
   Also it includes the po files and build scripts, which shouldn't be distributed alomg mo files.



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v3)", "*No copyright* GPL (v3)",
     "Expat License", "*No copyright* Creative Commons Attribution-
     ShareAlike Public License (v3.0)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "GNU Lesser
     General Public License (v2.1 or later)". 161 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/bob/packaging/review/uberwriter/review-
     uberwriter/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
     desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: uberwriter-2.1.5-3.fc31.noarch.rpm
          uberwriter-2.1.5-3.fc31.src.rpm
uberwriter.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pandoc -> pan doc, pan-doc, panda
uberwriter.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary uberwriter
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/ca/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/ca_ES/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/cs/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/de/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/es/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/eu/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/fr/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/hu/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/it/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/pl/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/pt/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/ru/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/si/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/sv/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/tr/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/vi/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/po/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/uberwriter.mo
uberwriter.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pandoc -> pan doc, pan-doc, panda
uberwriter.src:38: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
uberwriter.src:38: W: macro-in-comment %{_metainfodir}
uberwriter.src:38: W: macro-in-comment %{appname}
uberwriter.src: E: specfile-error warning: Macro expanded in comment on line 19: %{?_isa}
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 26 warnings.

Filed a bug: https://github.com/UberWriter/uberwriter/issues/173

Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/uberwriter.spec
SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/uberwriter-2.1.5-4.fc30.src.rpm

Good news: ported to Meson and renamed to Apostrophe now.

Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/apostrophe/fedora-32-x86_64/01342374-apostrophe/apostrophe.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/apostrophe/fedora-32-x86_64/01342374-apostrophe/apostrophe-2.2.0.1-1.fc32.src.rpm

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
     upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
     licenses manually.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
     desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
     Note: Cannot find any build in BUILD directory (--prebuilt option?)
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: apostrophe-2.2.0.1-1.fc33.noarch.rpm
          apostrophe-2.2.0.1-1.fc33.src.rpm
apostrophe.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency glib2
apostrophe.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pandoc -> pan doc, pan-doc, panda
apostrophe.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/.pylintrc
apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/bibtexparser/bparser.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/bibtexparser/bwriter.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/bibtexparser/customization.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/bibtexparser/latexenc.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/fuzzywuzzy/StringMatcher.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/fuzzywuzzy/fuzz.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/fuzzywuzzy/process.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
apostrophe.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary apostrophe
apostrophe.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pandoc -> pan doc, pan-doc, panda
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
apostrophe.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency glib2
apostrophe.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pandoc -> pan doc, pan-doc, panda
apostrophe.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/somas/apostrophe <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
apostrophe.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/.pylintrc
apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/bibtexparser/bparser.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/bibtexparser/bwriter.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/bibtexparser/customization.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/bibtexparser/latexenc.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/fuzzywuzzy/StringMatcher.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/fuzzywuzzy/fuzz.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/fuzzywuzzy/process.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
apostrophe.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary apostrophe
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 4 warnings.



Source checksums
----------------
https://gitlab.gnome.org/somas/apostrophe/-/archive/2.2.0.1/apostrophe-2.2.0.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : ead3818491c932684d30a53bc21ae30d44d17a91c8a8e23d1eb629affef6e8fe
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : ead3818491c932684d30a53bc21ae30d44d17a91c8a8e23d1eb629affef6e8fe


Requires
--------
apostrophe (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/python3
    glib2
    hicolor-icon-theme
    python(abi)
    python3-Levenshtein
    python3-cairo
    python3-enchant
    python3-pypandoc



Provides
--------
apostrophe:
    apostrophe
    application()
    application(org.gnome.gitlab.somas.Apostrophe.desktop)
    metainfo()
    metainfo(org.gnome.gitlab.somas.Apostrophe.appdata.xml)
    mimehandler(text/plain)
    mimehandler(text/x-markdown)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.5 (5fa5b7e) last change: 2020-02-16
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1734558
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Python, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: R, Haskell, Perl, Ocaml, PHP, C/C++, Java, SugarActivity, fonts
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Please fix the following rpmlint errors:

> apostrophe.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency glib2

Remove glib2 from Requires.

> apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/bibtexparser/bparser.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
> apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/bibtexparser/bwriter.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
> apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/bibtexparser/customization.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
> apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/bibtexparser/latexenc.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
> apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/fuzzywuzzy/StringMatcher.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
> apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/fuzzywuzzy/fuzz.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
> apostrophe.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/plugins/bibtex/fuzzywuzzy/process.py 644 /usr/bin/env python

Remove shebangs from these files in %prep using find and sed.

> apostrophe.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/apostrophe/.pylintrc

Remove this file in %prep too.

https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/apostrophe/fedora-32-x86_64/01342432-apostrophe/apostrophe.spec

https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/apostrophe/fedora-32-x86_64/01342432-apostrophe/apostrophe-2.2.0.1-2.fc32.src.rpm

Thanks for the quick fix. LGTM now. Package approved.

Slightly license description update

https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/apostrophe/fedora-32-x86_64/01342551-apostrophe/apostrophe.spec

https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/apostrophe/fedora-32-x86_64/01342551-apostrophe/apostrophe-2.2.0.1-3.fc32.src.rpm

(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/apostrophe

FEDORA-2020-84cb4ece2f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-84cb4ece2f

FEDORA-2020-473d3f7a77 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-473d3f7a77

FEDORA-2020-703f118e1c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-703f118e1c

FEDORA-2020-84cb4ece2f has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-84cb4ece2f \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-84cb4ece2f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

FEDORA-2020-473d3f7a77 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

FEDORA-2020-703f118e1c has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-703f118e1c \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-703f118e1c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

FEDORA-2020-84cb4ece2f has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

FEDORA-2020-703f118e1c has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.