Bug 173550

Summary: Review Request: xfce4-netload-plugin
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-extras-list, wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://xfce-goodies.berlios.de/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-01-26 14:04:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    

Description Christoph Wickert 2005-11-18 01:48:03 UTC
Spec Name or Url: 
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SPECS/xfce4-netload-plugin.spec
SRPM Name or Url: 
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-netload-plugin-0.3.3-2.fc4.src.rpm
Description: 
A network-load monitor plugin for the Xfce panel.

Comments:
rpmlint is clean
License GPL and included

Comment 1 Christoph Wickert 2005-12-01 13:26:53 UTC
- Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs.
- Fix %defattr.

New SRPM:
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-netload-plugin-0.3.3-3.fc4.src.rpm

Comment 2 Luya Tshimbalanga 2006-01-06 21:48:09 UTC
Passed test. Succesfully built via mock. Ready to be rolled on Extras.

Comment 3 Luya Tshimbalanga 2006-01-22 23:13:42 UTC
More detailed review:
+ mock succesfully build the package without noticeable error
+ rpmlint did not report any error nor warning
+ tarball from SRPM matched source tarball for URL listed on SPEC file through
md5 and sha1
+ binary package installed and removed without noticeable issue
+ name of the package/SPEC files follow PackagingGuide and PackageNameGuideline
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines
+ License listed on SPEC file matched the license in the tarball and it is GPL

Accordingly, the package is ready to be included on Fedora Extras.

Comment 4 Christoph Wickert 2006-01-26 14:04:17 UTC
Build on all targets succeeded.

CLOSED.