Bug 1735727
Summary: | Assertion `ecs->event_thread->control.exception_resume_breakpoint != NULL' failed | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Zdenek Dohnal <zdohnal> |
Component: | gdb | Assignee: | Keith Seitz <keiths> |
gdb sub component: | system-version | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-tools-bugs |
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | Docs Contact: | |
Severity: | unspecified | ||
Priority: | unspecified | CC: | gdb-bugs, ohudlick, sergiodj |
Version: | 8.1 | ||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | 8.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-08-09 16:36:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Zdenek Dohnal
2019-08-01 10:42:57 UTC
Apparently the same issue described at https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17174. I've installed qpdf-7.1.1-7.el8 onto my system along with its debuginfo packages, but I am clearly not using the correct arguments to run; I never seem to get to line 2383 (the program exits normally). Can you help me out with more steps to reproduce this? Hi Keith, I'm sorry I totally forgot to provide the arguments... and even scratch build is gone too :( and I do not remember which one of my broken patches for qpdf (since I finally fixed qpdf) caused this behavior in gdb. You can probably close the bug as INSUFFICIENT_DATA - because even if I find the arguments (which is feasible, because the output is clear and I can find it in test suite), I do not have my broken qpdf patch no more. These kinds of things are always a longshot to get a reproducer for, but we tried. I will take your advice and close w/INSUFFICIENT_DATA, but if you ever run into this again, please re-open or file a new bug. I would really like to see this resolved. |