Bug 173744
Summary: | n-u-t-t-c-p great successor to ttcp | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | acount closed by user <a1459440> |
Component: | ttcp | Assignee: | Radek Vokál <rvokal> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | ftp://ftp.lcp.nrl.navy.mil/pub/nuttcp/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-11-28 14:59:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 173823 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
acount closed by user
2005-11-20 14:31:50 UTC
It looks far too different from current ttcp. Would be nice to have it in extras first. I will try to package it later this week. Ok, here is my srpm http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/nuttcp/nuttcp-5.1.11-1.src.rpm I will propose it for extras tmrw. bugs: the nuttcp source is included twice into the src.rpm : -rw-rw-r-- 1 xose xose 109601 Jun 28 2004 nuttcp.c -rw-rw-r-- 1 xose xose 109601 Jun 28 2004 nuttcp-v5.1.11.c nuttcp.cat is not necessary, delete it. and put xinetd.d directoty into the %doc. -thanks- New package is here http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/nuttcp/nuttcp-5.1.11-2.src.rpm I've put nuttcp xinetd.d file into config section and installed it and others, nuttcp4 and nuttcp6 into docs. Do you think it's fine? Makefile and the "missing" directory(include files) are not necessary. It compiles clearly with: gcc -W -O2 -Wall nuttcp-v5.1.11.c -o nuttp debugfiles.list and debugsources.list should be deleted from source. The package is already submitted into Extras. I've removed the .list files but kept "missing" directory and makefile just to folow upstream for compatibility (if they want to add stm which will be missing in fedora it will be grabbed from this directory). Also I did fast clean-up of some warnings to make gcc more happy. |