Bug 173744

Summary: n-u-t-t-c-p great successor to ttcp
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: acount closed by user <a1459440>
Component: ttcpAssignee: Radek Vokal <rvokal>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: ftp://ftp.lcp.nrl.navy.mil/pub/nuttcp/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-11-28 14:59:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On: 173823    
Bug Blocks:    

Description acount closed by user 2005-11-20 14:31:50 UTC
ttcp is unmaintained, and n-u-t-t-c-p has more features.


-thanks-

Comment 1 Radek Vokal 2005-11-21 09:30:39 UTC
It looks far too different from current ttcp. Would be nice to have it in extras
first. I will try to package it later this week. 

Comment 2 Radek Vokal 2005-11-21 17:37:25 UTC
Ok, here is my srpm

http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/nuttcp/nuttcp-5.1.11-1.src.rpm

I will propose it for extras tmrw.

Comment 3 acount closed by user 2005-11-21 18:01:48 UTC
bugs:

the nuttcp source is included twice into the src.rpm :
-rw-rw-r--  1 xose xose 109601 Jun 28  2004 nuttcp.c
-rw-rw-r--  1 xose xose 109601 Jun 28  2004 nuttcp-v5.1.11.c

nuttcp.cat is not necessary, delete it.

and put xinetd.d directoty into the %doc.


-thanks-

Comment 4 Radek Vokal 2005-11-21 18:34:56 UTC
New package is here

http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/nuttcp/nuttcp-5.1.11-2.src.rpm

I've put nuttcp xinetd.d file into config section and installed it and others,
nuttcp4 and nuttcp6 into docs. Do you think it's fine? 

Comment 5 acount closed by user 2005-11-22 21:41:43 UTC
Makefile and the "missing" directory(include files) are not necessary. It
compiles clearly with: gcc -W -O2 -Wall nuttcp-v5.1.11.c -o nuttp

debugfiles.list and debugsources.list should be deleted from source.

Comment 6 Radek Vokal 2005-11-28 14:59:17 UTC
The package is already submitted into Extras. I've removed the .list files but
kept "missing" directory and makefile just to folow upstream for compatibility
(if they want to add stm which will be missing in fedora it will be grabbed from
this directory). Also I did fast clean-up of some warnings to make gcc more happy.