Bug 173773

Summary: bash completion for mock
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ville Skyttä <scop>
Component: mockAssignee: Seth Vidal <skvidal>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4CC: extras-qa
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, Patch
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-11-21 09:00:31 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
bash_completion support for mock none

Description Ville Skyttä 2005-11-20 22:09:35 UTC
Created attachment 121282 [details]
bash_completion support for mock

Comment 1 Ville Skyttä 2005-11-20 22:09:35 UTC
Attached is a bash_completion snippet for mock.  Let me know if you'd like me 
to commit this.

Comment 2 Seth Vidal 2005-11-20 22:33:31 UTC
why not put this in the bash completion package? It just seems like an odd place
to put it in the mock package if only in that it IMPLIES a
requirement/Suggestion of bash-completion.



Comment 3 Ville Skyttä 2005-11-20 22:43:19 UTC
I originally had it in my local bash-completion package, but I'd rather have 
it in mock for a few reasons: 
- Two triggers (triggerin/triggerun) less in the bash-completion package 
- More likely to be kept up to date when mock itself is updated 
- More likely to contain the switches for the installed version of mock 

Comment 4 Seth Vidal 2005-11-20 22:49:48 UTC
This seems like a slippery slope, though.

What keeps us from adding a bash completion file to EVERY cli package in extras
and core?

It just seems like a lot of clutter especially if you're not using bash completion.



Comment 5 Ville Skyttä 2005-11-20 23:31:36 UTC
Okay, so we disagree, let's not waste time arguing.  A simple yes/no will do, 
and I'll deal with it accordingly. 

Comment 6 Seth Vidal 2005-11-21 00:45:55 UTC
okay,

no.

It seems like the wrong place to put it, that's all.

sorry.



Comment 7 Ville Skyttä 2005-11-21 09:00:31 UTC
Ok, thanks, I'll add it to bash-completion then. 
 
But I can't help wondering what do you think the various foo.d directories in 
a lot of apps are for, if not for the purpose of providing a place for other 
apps to drop their snippets in in order to integrate with something.