Bug 1738476

Summary:	[Disconnect]Should point to a available registry for samples operator in disconnect env
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	XiuJuan Wang <xiuwang>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	Brandi Munilla <bmcelvee>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	XiuJuan Wang <xiuwang>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:	Vikram Goyal <vigoyal>
Priority:	high
Version:	4.2.0	CC:	adam.kaplan, aos-bugs, bmcelvee, bparees, gmontero, jokerman, obulatov, umohnani, wzheng
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	4.2.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-05-15 05:44:09 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description XiuJuan Wang 2019-08-07 09:27:18 UTC

Description of problem:
In disconnect env, samples operator is still seeking for registry.redhat.io that makes imagestreams under openshift project unavailable.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.2.0-0.nightly-2019-08-06-195545

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Check samples operator config in disconnect env
2.
3.

Actual results:
The default registry is pointing to registry.redhat.io.

Expected results:
Should have a available registry to use.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Adam Kaplan 2019-08-08 19:51:17 UTC

@XiuJuan our understanding is that CRI-O should be configured to use a mirror for registry.redhat.io - was this done?

Comment 2 Gabe Montero 2019-08-08 19:54:59 UTC

Yep if what Adam mentioned is not done, then you have to configure samples operator explicitly to override the registry setting that come in the samples payload, i.e. registry.redhat.io

Comment 6 Gabe Montero 2019-08-09 21:19:27 UTC

Brandi - fyi #comment 5 ^^

Comment 12 XiuJuan Wang 2019-09-27 08:58:18 UTC

@Gabe @Brandi
4.2 release docs are under reviewing, if doc for this bug will be included in 4.2, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BL3z5T-BL2EZWKpK-9Z461lUsAwmAaY8iOTpBgypHEk/edit?usp=sharing?

Comment 13 Gabe Montero 2019-09-27 13:26:53 UTC

IMO it is Brandi's call at this point as to when she'll be able to get it in.

Comment 14 Brandi Munilla 2019-09-27 20:30:57 UTC

We will get this content in for 4.2, it's just landing after the initial review. I'm sorry for the delay in response. Now that we have an idea where the content should go, I opened a PR (https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/16916) with the outline for this module. 

It's currently in draft form, and the actual procedure needs to be fleshed out quite a bit.

Comment 15 Brandi Munilla 2019-10-16 10:25:55 UTC

Reviews complete (on PR) and PR merged and cherrypicked.

Comment 16 Luke Meyer 2020-05-15 05:44:09 UTC

This should have been closed due to errata shipping. Closing now.