Bug 1739168

Summary:	djvulibre for EPEL 8
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Xavier Bachelot <xavier>
Component:	djvulibre	Assignee:	Marek Kašík <mkasik>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel8	CC:	audrey, carl, mkasik, orion, riehecky
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	djvulibre-3.5.28-3.el8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-03-25 21:29:55 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1739170

Description Xavier Bachelot 2019-08-08 16:31:03 UTC

Hi,

Could you please branch and build djvulibre for EPEL 8 ?
I verified git master builds properly against epel8 target.

Regards,
Xavier

Comment 1 Xavier Bachelot 2019-10-17 09:41:46 UTC

*** Bug 1759589 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Audrey Yeena Toskin 2020-01-16 23:40:34 UTC

*** Bug 1792072 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Carl George 🎩 2020-05-15 01:32:18 UTC

I'd advise against adding this to EPEL 8.  It's on it's way to CentOS Stream, and then RHEL.  If you add it now you'll have to retire it in roughly 5 1/2 months to comply with EPEL policy.

https://git.centos.org/rpms/djvulibre/c/cf53305a15146253a6c4bc677bd935d288b2458a?branch=c8s

Comment 4 Orion Poplawski 2022-03-08 18:18:55 UTC

Is this still the case?  It's almost 10 months later and I don't see it in CentOS Stream 8.

Comment 5 Orion Poplawski 2022-03-08 18:38:01 UTC

I don't think this is going to make it into EL8, so it would be great to get it into EPEL8 if possible.  Marek - are you up for it?

Comment 6 Marek Kašík 2022-03-09 15:42:39 UTC

Hi,

yes, I can add it there. I just want to mention that it will not work with evince since we don't build evince-djvu.

Comment 7 Orion Poplawski 2022-03-16 22:43:10 UTC

Marek - thanks.  That's fine by me as I don't use evince :)

Comment 8 Marek Kašík 2022-03-17 14:07:30 UTC

Ok then, I've requested the branch and will fill it once it is ready. I'm sorry for the delay.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-03-18 12:04:15 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-57b13ae511 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-57b13ae511

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2022-03-18 19:51:46 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-57b13ae511 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-57b13ae511

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2022-03-25 21:29:55 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-57b13ae511 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.