Bug 174069

Summary: spec file doesnt allow for non-selinux compile
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: JW <ohtmvyyn>
Component: util-linuxAssignee: Karel Zak <kzak>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-11-24 05:59:10 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Attachments:
Description Flags
allow for optional selinux and audit compilation none

Description JW 2005-11-24 04:58:55 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows; U; AIIEEEE!; Win98; Windows 98; en-US; Gecko masquerading as IE; should it matter?; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050217

Description of problem:
The spec file doesn allow for non-selinux compilation


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
util-linux-2.12p-9.12

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.rpmbuild -v -ba --define "WITH_SELINUX 0" util-linux.spec
2.
3.
  

Actual Results:  All utilities have selinux linkage


Expected Results:  There should be no reference to selinux


Additional info:

I also now understand why readahead and prelink exist - pam+selinux+audit create serious startup overhead.

Are you sure MS hasn't being buying up RH shares?  Are they trying to do to RH/Linux what they did to SCO Linux?
Comment 1 JW 2005-11-24 05:04:33 EST
Created attachment 121440 [details]
allow for optional selinux and audit compilation
Comment 2 Karel Zak 2005-11-24 05:59:10 EST
Sorry, but our packages are optimalized for our distribution(s). We don't have
resources and effort to support arbitrary packages customization.

Closing as WONTFIX.
Comment 3 JW 2005-11-24 06:15:39 EST
(In reply to comment #2)
> Sorry, but our packages are optimalized for our distribution(s). We don't have
> resources and effort to support arbitrary packages customization.
> 
> Closing as WONTFIX.

That's ok because I created the patch for free.
No need to thank me for it though.

BTW you had the resources to create SeLinux in the first place. Pity you never
had the resources to implement your code in a modular fashion.  You get what you
pay for I suppose.