Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||spec file doesnt allow for non-selinux compile|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||JW <ohtmvyyn>|
|Component:||util-linux||Assignee:||Karel Zak <kzak>|
|Status:||CLOSED WONTFIX||QA Contact:||Ben Levenson <benl>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2005-11-24 05:59:10 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description JW 2005-11-24 04:58:55 EST
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows; U; AIIEEEE!; Win98; Windows 98; en-US; Gecko masquerading as IE; should it matter?; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050217 Description of problem: The spec file doesn allow for non-selinux compilation Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): util-linux-2.12p-9.12 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.rpmbuild -v -ba --define "WITH_SELINUX 0" util-linux.spec 2. 3. Actual Results: All utilities have selinux linkage Expected Results: There should be no reference to selinux Additional info: I also now understand why readahead and prelink exist - pam+selinux+audit create serious startup overhead. Are you sure MS hasn't being buying up RH shares? Are they trying to do to RH/Linux what they did to SCO Linux?
Comment 1 JW 2005-11-24 05:04:33 EST
Created attachment 121440 [details] allow for optional selinux and audit compilation
Comment 2 Karel Zak 2005-11-24 05:59:10 EST
Sorry, but our packages are optimalized for our distribution(s). We don't have resources and effort to support arbitrary packages customization. Closing as WONTFIX.
Comment 3 JW 2005-11-24 06:15:39 EST
(In reply to comment #2) > Sorry, but our packages are optimalized for our distribution(s). We don't have > resources and effort to support arbitrary packages customization. > > Closing as WONTFIX. That's ok because I created the patch for free. No need to thank me for it though. BTW you had the resources to create SeLinux in the first place. Pity you never had the resources to implement your code in a modular fashion. You get what you pay for I suppose.