Bug 174297
Summary: | Suboptimal completion dialog placement | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ville Skyttä <scop> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5 | CC: | jrb, mattdm |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-03-11 16:34:03 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 150225 |
Description
Ville Skyttä
2005-11-27 13:54:43 UTC
Hrmm... this is just using the standard gtk functionality and I odn't think there's any control over placement for there. Jonathan -- am I missing something? :) I could have sworn that I exposed tree_view->priv->search_dialog_position_func in a public API. I really, really meant to. But it looks like its not there. Filed at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322591 [Note that the funcionality for TreeView search is completely done with public API, so you could always fake it; not a whole lot of fun, though. ] Yeah, I prefer just using the toolkit rather than reimplementing it :P Fedora Core 5 and Fedora Core 6 are, as we're sure you've noticed, no longer test releases. We're cleaning up the bug database and making sure important bug reports filed against these test releases don't get lost. It would be helpful if you could test this issue with a released version of Fedora or with the latest development / test release. Thanks for your help and for your patience. [This is a bulk message for all open FC5/FC6 test release bugs. I'm adding myself to the CC list for each bug, so I'll see any comments you make after this and do my best to make sure every issue gets proper attention.] The information we've requested above is required in order to review this problem report further and diagnose/fix the issue if it is still present. Since there have not been any updates to the report since thirty (30) days or more since we requested additional information, we're assuming the problem is either no longer present in the current Fedora release, or that there is no longer any interest in tracking the problem. Setting status to "INSUFFICIENT_DATA". If you still experience this problem after updating to our latest Fedora release and can provide the information previously requested, please feel free to reopen the bug report. Thank you in advance. |