Bug 1746811
Summary: | [Operator-registory]"no bundle found" wrong operator will impact the load of the following operators packagemanifests | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Fan Jia <jfan> | ||||
Component: | OLM | Assignee: | Nick Hale <nhale> | ||||
OLM sub component: | OLM | QA Contact: | Fan Jia <jfan> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | |||||
Severity: | high | ||||||
Priority: | high | CC: | chezhang, ecordell, jiazha, zzhao | ||||
Version: | 4.2.0 | Keywords: | Reopened | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | 4.2.0 | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | |||||||
: | 1750867 (view as bug list) | Environment: | |||||
Last Closed: | 2019-10-16 06:38:33 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 1750867 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Comment 1
Evan Cordell
2019-08-29 22:24:45 UTC
Created attachment 1609736 [details]
operatorhub.page
If you run `oc get packagemanifest` then 4 or 5 operators in the ns can't be loaded, and the web console can only show the operators of the `oc get packagemanifest` result. I delete all the other opsrc and only leave the opsrc with the ns "rh-osbs-operators" . The operator num of `oc get packagemanifest` only be 18 now and the web console also show 18 operators. But the operataors num in the ns is 24. $ oc get packagemanifest NAME CATALOG AGE 3scale-operator opsrctest 13m activemq-artemis opsrctest 13m amq-online opsrctest 13m amq-streams opsrctest 13m businessautomation-operator opsrctest 13m cluster-logging opsrctest 13m datagrid opsrctest 13m elasticsearch-operator opsrctest 13m fuse-apicurito opsrctest 13m fuse-camel-k opsrctest 13m fuse-online opsrctest 13m jaeger-product opsrctest 13m kiali-ossm opsrctest 13m kubefed-operator opsrctest 13m kubevirt-hyperconverged opsrctest 13m maistra opsrctest 13m metering opsrctest 13m metering-ocp opsrctest 13m The web console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1609736 I followed the steps you onlined in a new cluster: 1. Created rh-osbs-operators operatorsource 2. Disabled all others The operatorsource indicates the following 24 packages exist in quay: openshiftansibleservicebroker,metering,3scale-operator,kubefed-operator,kiali-ossm,fuse-apicurito,fuse-camel-k,activemq-artemis,jaeger-product,sriov-network-operator,servicemeshoperator,cluster-logging,elasticsearch-operator,businessautomation-operator,amq-online,fuse-online,amq-streams,maistra,metering-ocp,openshifttemplateservicebroker,nfd,kubevirt-hyperconverged,datagrid,serverless-operator The catalog source indicates an issue loading 6 of them (reformatted for clarity): time="2019-08-30T14:12:17Z" level=warning msg="strict mode disabled" error="error loading manifests from appregistry: error loading operator manifests: [ error loading package into db: activemq-artemis-operator.v0.8.0 specifies replacement that couldn't be found, error loading package into db: no default channel specified for cluster-logging error loading package into db: no default channel specified for elasticsearch-operator error loading package into db: no bundle found for csv nfd.v4.2, error loading package into db: no default channel specified for openshiftansibleservicebroker error loading package into db: no default channel specified for openshifttemplateservicebroker] " port=50051 type=appregistry The UI shows 18 packages loaded. 24-6 = 18, so this is behaving as expected. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2922 |