Bug 1754944

Summary: Retire python-sudsds in Fedora 32+
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Miro Hrončok <mhroncok>
Component: python-sudsdsAssignee: Miro Hrončok <mhroncok>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: cstratak, extras-orphan, igor.raits, jskarvad, lbalhar, mhroncok, ngompa13, pviktori, zbyszek
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-10-01 07:43:58 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1625773, 1698500    

Description Miro Hrončok 2019-09-24 12:10:33 UTC 
In line with the Mass Python 2 Package Removal [0], all (sub)packages of python-sudsds were marked for removal:

 * python2-sudsds

According to our query, those (sub)packages only provide a Python 2 importable module. If this is not true, please tell us why, so we can fix our query.

Please retire your package in Rawhide (Fedora 32).

Please don't remove packages from Fedora 31, it is past Beta Freeze.
Please don't do this for Fedora 30/29 either, removing packages from a released Fedora branch is forbidden.

If there is no objection in a week, we will retire the package for you.

We hope this doesn't come to you as a surprise. If you want to know our motivation for this, please read the change document [0].

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F31_Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal
Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2019-09-24 12:11:19 UTC 
*** Bug 1738088 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Jaroslav Škarvada 2019-09-24 12:21:07 UTC 
Ups, I have already retired python-dslib (which is related package) in f31, but it should be harmless - IMHO nobody uses it :)
Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2019-09-24 12:28:26 UTC 
Should be fine, we just play it safe with those automated bugzillas.