Bug 1756202
| Summary: | Build hugo with extensions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ranjan Maitra <itsme_410> |
| Component: | hugo | Assignee: | Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 32 | CC: | athoscribeiro, go-sig, mike |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | hugo-0.69.0-2.fc32~bootstrap | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-04-27 02:43:40 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ranjan Maitra
2019-09-27 04:54:09 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle. Changing version to 32. I pulled Panagiotiss' work (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/panagiotiss/hugo_extended/) into Elliott's RPM specification. See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hugo/pull-request/10. This seems to build on (unreleased) Fedora 32. (In reply to W. Michael Petullo from comment #2) > I pulled Panagiotiss' work > (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/panagiotiss/hugo_extended/) into > Elliott's RPM specification. See > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hugo/pull-request/10. This seems to build > on (unreleased) Fedora 32. Why not merge this project with hugo? The maintainer may not be able to take care of this package anymore, given https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799514 Would shipping a hugo-extended binary as well work for you on this one? On a second though, There are no reasons for not shipping it in the main binary. This is now fixed in rawhide. (In reply to Athos Ribeiro from comment #5) > On a second though, There are no reasons for not shipping it in the main > binary. > > This is now fixed in rawhide. Thanks, looking forward to it on Fedora. FEDORA-2020-d74df0d232 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d74df0d232 FEDORA-2020-d74df0d232 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-d74df0d232` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d74df0d232 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2020-c23de8ac42 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c23de8ac42 FEDORA-2020-c23de8ac42 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-c23de8ac42` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c23de8ac42 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2020-c23de8ac42 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |