Bug 1759332

Summary: Can fuse be extended to permit fuse mounts to use cachefilesd/fsc
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Oscar Santos <ossantos>
Component: kernelAssignee: fs-maint Bot <fs-maint>
kernel sub component: File Systems - Other QA Contact: Filesystem QE <fs-qe>
Status: NEW --- Docs Contact:
Severity: medium    
Priority: low CC: bstinson, ccalhoun, dhowells, dwysocha, fsorenso, jshivers, jwboyer, mszeredi, riehecky, swhiteho, xzhou
Version: CentOS StreamKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Milestone: rcFlags: ossantos: needinfo-
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Comment 12 Dave Wysochanski 2022-02-04 20:46:06 UTC 
Not sure anyone has seriously given this any cycles.  Probably conditional NACK Capacity is appropriate.  Also, moving to RHEL9.  Given the upstream rewrite of fscache with netfs, and dependence on folios with no plans to backport to RHEL8, RHEL9 seems the only option, if this ever happens at all.
Comment 14 Eric Sandeen 2023-07-14 15:15:52 UTC 
Reassigning this open bug to fs-maint.redhat.com as the old fs-maint mailing list has been deprecated.