Bug 176090
Summary: | Segfault on startup of fish | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Gen Zhang <genneth> |
Component: | fish | Assignee: | Axel Liljencrantz <liljencrantz> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4 | CC: | extras-qa, i, oliver |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-04-02 12:05:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Gen Zhang
2005-12-19 10:42:51 UTC
This bug is fixed in later fish releases, Fedora is lagging behind the main fish releases. You can temporarily fix this by downloading an RPM from the fish homepage at http://roo.no-ip.org/fish/. Hopefully, the Fedora packaging of fish will be better in synch in the future. (volounteer packagers are welcomed) I took the SRPM from the website and built rpms that way. I can comfirm that they work perfectly. Should I resolve the bug? If so, to what? You wouldn't happen to feel like maintaining fish on Fedora? In that case, you could simply update the fish on fedora and mark the bug as fixed. Otherwise, I guess the bug isn't resolved and should be left as is. What would be involved with maintaining fish in Extras? I only have an AMD64 box, so my ability to test would be a little limited. > Fedora is lagging behind the main fish releases.
You are the package maintainer, aren't you?
|