Bug 176110
Summary: | obscure package naming makes it hard to find missing packages | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | John Ellson <john.ellson> |
Component: | tomcat5 | Assignee: | Vivek Lakshmanan <viveklak> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | sundaram |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 5.5.25 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-01-05 13:42:41 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
John Ellson
2005-12-19 16:09:44 UTC
A package with version number doesnt look that meaningless to me. What would you suggest as a alternative? If you want to install the whole bunch of Java apps you can use yum # yum groupinstall "Java Development" I don't get a reference to a package and version number. I just get "jta" I don't wish to use yum. I want to be able to use just rpm. If yum can resolve "jta" to a package with just rpm queries, how does it do it? Already fixed in current releases. Closing. |