Bug 1762219

Summary:	libbpf: please also build for EPEL
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek>
Component:	libbpf	Assignee:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	32	CC:	jolsa, junw99
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-04-28 08:00:57 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2019-10-16 09:01:10 UTC

Description of problem:
systemd is considering using libbpf (https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/13744). A package in EPEL (7 and 8) would make it easier to compile on Centos/Rhel, in particular for CI.

libbpf-0.0.5 builds fine in epel7 and epel8 mock, so this should be just a matter of compiling in two additional branches.

Comment 1 Ben Cotton 2020-02-11 17:51:42 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle.
Changing version to 32.

Comment 2 Jiri Olsa 2021-04-28 08:00:57 UTC

we're far from 0.0.5, closing, please reopen if needed