Bug 1764048
Summary: | libpsl-devel (needed for EPEL-8 packages) is not included in CRB | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Nicki Křížek <nicki> |
Component: | libpsl | Assignee: | Kamil Dudka <kdudka> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Daniel Rusek <drusek> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 8.0 | CC: | drusek, fsumsal, i, jwboyer, kdudka, mcatanza, mschorm, svashisht, yselkowi |
Target Milestone: | pre-dev-freeze | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
Target Release: | 8.2 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | libpsl-0.20.2-6.el8 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
Doc Text: |
Feature:
The libpsl-devel package is now available in CRB repository.
Reason:
The package is needed for build of EPEL-8 packages.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-11-04 02:02:53 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Nicki Křížek
2019-10-22 08:16:10 UTC
libpsl is in RHEL-8. You should be able to build EPEL-8 packages against it already. Ah, I didn't notice. The issue is the lua-psl requires libpsl-devel for the build, which I'm not able to find in RHEL8. The failed lua-psl build: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3940/38463940/root.log Should I file this bug against the RHEL8 lua-psl component? Sorry, libpsl-devel is not available in the epel8-build repo because it is not included in RHEL-8 CRB. I will ask internally whether libpsl-devel could be added to RHEL-8 CRB. Any update on this? libpsl-devel still seems to be missing in epel8-build Per comment #3 I added this request to our internal tracker for missing -devel packages in CRB. No decision has been made so far and there is not much I can do to move this forward. It is not my decision which (sub)packages will be added and which not. Sorry about that. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (libpsl bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2020:4555 |