Bug 1766124

Summary: libdnf assumes rpmdb is in Berkeley DB format
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai>
Component: libdnfAssignee: rpm-software-management
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 32CC: jmracek, jrohel, mblaha, pkratoch, rpm-software-management
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-02-05 13:45:24 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1766120    

Description Panu Matilainen 2019-10-28 11:05:07 UTC
This is the Fedora counterpart of upstream https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/issues/362 ticket, mainly for tracking purposes.

Comment 1 Panu Matilainen 2019-10-29 10:04:12 UTC
For the record, https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/commit/4cd90939d45fa8056f00873665a1d166158edf70 seems to be sufficient to get basic libdnf functionality going with alternative rpmdb backends for testing purposes. So test-blockage can be removed by just backporting that.

Comment 2 Ben Cotton 2020-02-11 17:19:05 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle.
Changing version to 32.

Comment 3 Panu Matilainen 2021-02-05 13:45:24 UTC
AFAICT this has gotten fixed in all the versions that we care about, so I'll just close this bit of monologue...