Bug 176697

Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED CANTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: green
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-02-20 05:57:19 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449, 176712    

Description Ralf Corsepius 2005-12-30 02:32:34 EST
Spec: http://ftp.skynet.be/pub/packman/fedora/SRPMS/i386-rtems4.7-binutils.spec
SRPM: http://ftp.skynet.be/pub/packman/fedora/SRPMS/i386-rtems4.7-binutils-2.16.1-0.20051229.1.src.rpm

Description:
RTEMS is an OS for embedded systems. This is the GNU binutils targetting i386-rtems4.7 (i.e. linux->i386-rtems4.7 cross-binutils).

I plan to submit a corresponding cross-gcc in near future. Further cross toolchains may follow, should the i386-rtems4.7 toolchain be accepted.
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-07-07 15:38:15 EDT
Trying to get FE-GUIDELINES blockers right; sorry for the spam.
Comment 2 Anthony Green 2006-07-13 19:59:55 EDT
I was thinking of contributing a cross toolchain for me treo.  Rather than fill
Extras with independent GNU ports, does it make sense to collaborate on a
cross-(binutils|gcc|etc) SRPM that builds various binary toolchains from the
single set of sources?  I think that would be nice.
Comment 3 Ralf Corsepius 2007-02-20 05:57:19 EST
No feedback > 1 year.