Bug 1767054

Summary: audit rules exist as documentation not package shared data
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Steve Milner <smilner>
Component: auditAssignee: Steve Grubb <sgrubb>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Ondrej Moriš <omoris>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact: Mirek Jahoda <mjahoda>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.1CC: josorior, jpazdziora, miabbott, mjahoda, omoris
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 8.2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: audit-3.0-0.14.20191104git1c2f876 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-28 16:46:58 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Steve Milner 2019-10-30 15:25:42 UTC
Description of problem:

The audit package ships rules in it's doc location:

    /usr/share/doc/audit/rules/

However, these files are note exactly docs and may something folks would want to use via copy or link


How reproducible:

Always as it's packaged this way


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install audit
2. ls /usr/share/doc/audit/rules/

Actual results:

You'll find all the rules in the docs

Expected results:

Rules exist in /usr/share/audit/rules (or another non doc location)

Additional info:

RHEL CoreOS strips out documentation to save on space for OCP. However, there is a need to be able to utilize the example rules in some situations. Because these rules exist as documentation they don't make it on composes that don't include documentation.

Comment 1 Juan Antonio Osorio 2019-10-30 15:45:04 UTC
this would be very useful for us to document for customers how to link the appropriate files via MachineConfig, for customers that need to meet FedRAMP moderate for instance. Instead of telling them to copy entire audit rules into MachineConfig files.

Comment 2 Steve Grubb 2019-10-30 15:47:49 UTC
Upstream commit f515921 now places the audit rules in /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/
This is planned to be pulled in by the audit rebase bug 1757986.

Comment 6 Steve Grubb 2019-11-04 20:50:31 UTC
audit-3.0-0.14.20191104git1c2f876 has been built to address this issue.

Comment 8 Ondrej Moriš 2019-11-10 21:37:18 UTC
Successfully verified.

NEW (audit-3.0-0.15.20191104git1c2f876.el8)
===========================================

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::   Setup
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

:: [ 16:33:07 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking for the presence of audit rpm 
:: [ 16:33:07 ] :: [   LOG    ] :: Package versions:
:: [ 16:33:07 ] :: [   LOG    ] ::   audit-3.0-0.15.20191104git1c2f876.el8.x86_64
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Starting auditd service (Expected 0, got 0)
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Removing all rules (Expected 0, got 0)
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   LOG    ] :: There are 34 rule files provided
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::   Duration: 7s
::   Assertions: 3 good, 0 bad
::   RESULT: PASS (Setup)


::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::   Rules location
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/10-base-config.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/10-no-audit.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/11-loginuid.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/12-cont-fail.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/12-ignore-error.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/20-dont-audit.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/21-no32bit.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/22-ignore-chrony.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/23-ignore-filesystems.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-nispom.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-ospp-v42-1-create-failed.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-ospp-v42-1-create-success.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-ospp-v42-2-modify-failed.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-ospp-v42-2-modify-success.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-ospp-v42-3-access-failed.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-ospp-v42-3-access-success.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-ospp-v42-4-delete-failed.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-ospp-v42-4-delete-success.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-ospp-v42-5-perm-change-failed.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-ospp-v42-5-perm-change-success.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-ospp-v42-6-owner-change-failed.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-ospp-v42-6-owner-change-success.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-ospp-v42.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-pci-dss-v31.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/30-stig.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/31-privileged.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/32-power-abuse.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/40-local.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/41-containers.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/42-injection.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/43-module-load.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/70-einval.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/71-networking.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
:: [ 16:33:14 ] :: [   PASS   ] :: Checking /usr/share/audit/sample-rules/99-finalize.rules (Assert: '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules' should equal '/usr/share/audit/sample-rules')
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::   Duration: 0s
::   Assertions: 34 good, 0 bad
::   RESULT: PASS (Rules location)

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2020-04-28 16:46:58 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:1812