Bug 1767100
Summary: | nameservers are not written correctly by the ifcfg module | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Christophe Besson <cbesson> |
Component: | dracut | Assignee: | Lukáš Nykrýn <lnykryn> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Frantisek Sumsal <fsumsal> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 8.0 | CC: | dracut-maint-list, dtardon, fkrska, fsumsal, jamacku |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Patch, Triaged |
Target Release: | 8.0 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | dracut-049-129.git20210107.el8 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-05-18 15:02:41 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Christophe Besson
2019-10-30 16:58:45 UTC
Additionally, there is no way to define a DOMAIN with this ifcfg module. This is a second issue, since the early network setup overwrites files generated by anaconda (parse-kickstart), so there is no way to define the DOMAIN value in the ifcfg file (the NetworkManager reads that to write /etc/resolv.conf). Pull-request that should fix this issue was send to upstream: https://github.com/dracutdevs/dracut/pull/667 Thanks, and what about the 2nd (related) issue about the DOMAIN definition? Should I open another bug for that one? Yeah, maybe it would be better to have this covered in separated bugs. Since the nameserver part was a bugfix, while the domain part is RFE. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (dracut bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:1661 |