Bug 1768784

Summary: [rhv-4.4.0-4] webadmin - destroy storage domain is not possible via UI
Product: [oVirt] ovirt-engine Reporter: Avihai <aefrat>
Component: BLL.StorageAssignee: Ahmad Khiet <akhiet>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Ilan Zuckerman <izuckerm>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.4.0CC: akhiet, bugs, dfodor, tnisan
Target Milestone: ovirt-4.4.0Flags: pm-rhel: ovirt-4.4+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-05-20 19:57:40 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Storage RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
video_capture of the issue
none
preview_master_17nov19
none
Another attempt shows the issue on rhv-4.4.0-4 storage-ge-04 ENV
none
issue print screen of the issue at rhv-4.4.0-6
none
verified none

Description Avihai 2019-11-05 09:44:36 UTC
Created attachment 1632898 [details]
video_capture of the issue

Description of problem:
destroy storage domain is not possible via UI , see the video capture.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhv-4.4.0-4 (http://bob.eng.lab.tlv.redhat.com/builds/4.4/rhv-4.4.0-4/)

ovirt-engine-4.4.0-0.4.master.el7.noarch
vdsm-4.40.0-127.gitc628cce.el8ev.x86_64
python3-libvirt-5.0.0-5.module+el8.0.1+3755+6782b0ed.x86_64
qemu-kvm-3.1.0-30.module+el8.0.1+3755+6782b0ed.x86_64


How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Try to destroy a storage domain(ISCSI)

Actual results:
destroy storage domain is not possible via UI , see the video capture.


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Ahmad Khiet 2019-11-17 12:03:49 UTC
Created attachment 1637023 [details]
preview_master_17nov19

I tried it on master, I did not see this issue. ( attached a gif ) 
did I miss something?

Comment 2 Avihai 2019-11-18 05:09:23 UTC
(In reply to Ahmad Khiet from comment #1)
> Created attachment 1637023 [details]
> preview_master_17nov19
> 
> I tried it on master, I did not see this issue. ( attached a gif ) 
> did I miss something?

Occurs with firefox(66.0.4 (64-bit)) or chrome.( I used Version 78.0.3904.87 (Official Build) (64-bit) )
you can check out the ENV this occurred on(storage-ge-04) for reproduction - you can also debug there.

Comment 3 Ahmad Khiet 2019-11-18 07:29:39 UTC
tried on master build in both chrome and firefox and it did not reproduce!
chrome : Version 78.0.3904.97 (Official Build) (64-bit)
firefox: 66.0.4 (64-bit)

Comment 4 Avihai 2019-11-24 16:20:40 UTC
(In reply to Ahmad Khiet from comment #3)
> tried on master build in both chrome and firefox and it did not reproduce!
> chrome : Version 78.0.3904.97 (Official Build) (64-bit)
> firefox: 66.0.4 (64-bit)

did you try it on my ENV(https://storage-ge-04.scl.lab.tlv.redhat.com) which is on formal [rhv-4.4.0-4]?
This reproduce each time(see print screen from another attempt I made today)

Comment 5 Avihai 2019-11-24 16:21:34 UTC
Created attachment 1639235 [details]
Another attempt shows the issue on rhv-4.4.0-4 storage-ge-04 ENV

Comment 6 Ahmad Khiet 2019-12-02 09:23:29 UTC
for now, the issue is not present in master, 
after testing it in the environment you provided, I saw that it was present in the build you are working on.
can you please re-check if it still presents in the next build?

Comment 7 Avihai 2019-12-08 14:32:42 UTC
(In reply to Ahmad Khiet from comment #6)
> for now, the issue is not present in master, 
> after testing it in the environment you provided, I saw that it was present
> in the build you are working on.
> can you please re-check if it still presents in the next build?

Yep, it's still here.(see print screen attached)
Tested on rhv-4.4.0-6 (http://bob.eng.lab.tlv.redhat.com/builds/4.4/rhv-4.4.0-6/)

I sent you a mail with the ENV details you can check it out.

Comment 8 Avihai 2019-12-08 14:33:39 UTC
Created attachment 1643017 [details]
issue print screen of the issue at rhv-4.4.0-6

Comment 9 Ahmad Khiet 2019-12-23 08:04:56 UTC
FYI, the bug did not appear in master,
the 'before' screenshots from rhev.

Comment 10 Ahmad Khiet 2019-12-23 08:05:24 UTC
*rhv
Screenshots : https://imgur.com/a/Ckqcic7

Comment 11 RHV bug bot 2020-01-08 14:48:35 UTC
INFO: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Tag 'ovirt-engine-4.4.0' doesn't contain patch 'https://gerrit.ovirt.org/105763']
gitweb: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-engine.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/ovirt-engine-4.4.0

For more info please contact: infra

Comment 12 RHV bug bot 2020-01-08 15:14:55 UTC
INFO: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Tag 'ovirt-engine-4.4.0' doesn't contain patch 'https://gerrit.ovirt.org/105763']
gitweb: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-engine.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/ovirt-engine-4.4.0

For more info please contact: infra

Comment 13 RHV bug bot 2020-01-24 19:50:25 UTC
INFO: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Tag 'ovirt-engine-4.4.0' doesn't contain patch 'https://gerrit.ovirt.org/105763']
gitweb: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-engine.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/ovirt-engine-4.4.0

For more info please contact: infra

Comment 14 Ilan Zuckerman 2020-03-19 10:31:45 UTC
Verified on ovirt-engine-4.4.0-0.25.master.el8ev.noarch
Both on chrome and ff.
Attaching the screenshot of well scaled dialog window for destroying the SD.

Comment 15 Ilan Zuckerman 2020-03-19 10:32:37 UTC
Created attachment 1671396 [details]
verified

Comment 16 Sandro Bonazzola 2020-05-20 19:57:40 UTC
This bugzilla is included in oVirt 4.4.0 release, published on May 20th 2020.

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in oVirt 4.4.0 release, it has been closed with a resolution of CURRENT RELEASE.

If the solution does not work for you, please open a new bug report.