Bug 1771141

Summary:	Review Request: nodejs-cli-table3 - Pretty unicode tables for the command line
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jared Smith <jsmith.fedora>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	eclipseo, package-review
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-01-08 00:45:57 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449, 956806

Description Jared Smith 2019-11-11 21:48:06 UTC

Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-cli-table3/nodejs-cli-table3.spec
SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-cli-table3/nodejs-cli-table3-0.5.1-1.fc31.src.rpm
Description: Pretty unicode tables for the command line
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-12-09 00:03:58 UTC

 - License ok
 - Latest version packaged
 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines



Package doesn't install:

DEBUG util.py:582:   Problem: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:582:    - nothing provides (npm(string-width) >= 2.1.1 with npm(string-width) < 3) needed by nodejs-cli-table3-0.5.1-1.fc32.noarch

You need to update nodejs-string-width in Rawhide.

Comment 2 Package Review 2020-12-08 00:45:26 UTC

This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 3 Package Review 2021-01-08 00:45:57 UTC

This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.