Bug 1773344

Summary:	Review Request: python-odfdo - Python library for OpenDocument format
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Thomas Andrejak <thomas.andrejak>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fschwarz, package-review, samuel-rhbugs
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-01-10 00:45:25 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Thomas Andrejak 2019-11-17 19:16:22 UTC

Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~totol/python-odfdo.spec
SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~totol/python-odfdo-3.0.1-1.el8.src.rpm
Description: odfdo is a Python3 library implementing the ISO/IEC 26300 OpenDocument Format standard. odfdo is a derivative work of the lpod-python project.
Fedora Account System Username: totol

Comment 1 Felix Schwarz 2019-12-10 07:34:39 UTC

just a few random comments:
- %license is empty
- you should fetch Source0 from github releases (if you don't like the auto-generated archive file name, there is a way to change that) or document why this is not possible
- I prefer using "%src_name" instead of "%pkg_name" because the former enables the use of "%%pypi_source" (not applicable for this package because it is not available on pypi but maybe we can get a bit more consistency for Python packages).

Comment 2 Felix Schwarz 2019-12-10 07:37:20 UTC

Also: odfdo seems to be dead upstream - are you sure you need to package it? If another application requires it maybe it is better to work with that project to switch to another library with a more healthy development community.

Comment 3 Package Review 2020-12-10 00:45:23 UTC

This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 4 Package Review 2021-01-10 00:45:25 UTC

This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.