Bug 1773638

Summary: kata-agent files are PIE but only partially RELRO
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin>
Component: kata-osbuilderAssignee: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 32CC: crobinso, dinechin, fidencio, jose.carlos.venegas.munoz
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-04-19 09:46:23 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Comment 1 Christophe de Dinechin 2019-11-18 15:29:56 UTC
      {
         "module" : "ElfChecks",
         "order" : 14,
         "results" : [
            {
               "arch" : "x86_64",
               "code" : "PiePartialRelro",
               "diag" : "File is PIE but only partially RELRO: <tt>/usr/libexec/kata-containers/osbuilder/agent/kata-agent</tt>",
               "subpackage" : "kata-osbuilder"
            }
         ],
         "run_time" : 0,
         "status" : "completed"
      },

Comment 2 Ben Cotton 2020-02-11 17:45:37 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle.
Changing version to 32.

Comment 3 Fabiano FidĂȘncio 2021-04-19 06:42:18 UTC
Christophe,

What's the status of this issue?  Is this stale?
Please, take some time and consider whether this should still be opened, testing against kata-containers package, as packages for 1.x will won't be updated after May 12th (as the 1.x project upstream will reach its EOL: http://lists.katacontainers.io/pipermail/kata-dev/2021-April/001843.html)

Best Regards

Comment 4 Christophe de Dinechin 2021-04-19 09:46:23 UTC
I should have closed this one. I was wondering if this was indicating incorrect compilation flags.