Bug 1773890

Summary:	fence_scsi: add support for hash key-value based on node name instead of node ID
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8	Reporter:	Oyvind Albrigtsen <oalbrigt>
Component:	fence-agents	Assignee:	Oyvind Albrigtsen <oalbrigt>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	cluster-qe <cluster-qe>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	8.1	CC:	cluster-maint, mjuricek
Target Milestone:	rc	Flags:	pm-rhel: mirror+
Target Release:	8.2
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	fence-agents-4.2.1-37.el8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-04-28 15:30:27 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Oyvind Albrigtsen 2019-11-19 09:14:22 UTC

Description of problem:
Add support for hash key-value based on node name instead of node ID (which can change if a node is removed from the cluster).

This is added as key_value/--key-value parameter and metadata recommending to use the new method (defaults to old default to avoid issues for users upgrading).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create cluster with 3 nodes (e.g. node1, node2, node3)
2. Remove node2
3. Node ID has decreased for node3

Actual results:
Fails on node3 due to incorrect node ID after removing node2.

Expected results:
Doesnt fail after removing node2.

Additional info:
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/fence-agents/pull/289

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2020-04-28 15:30:27 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:1580