Bug 1775105

Summary: Editing an embedded Ansible machine credential does not display the configured username for that credential
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Peter McGowan <pmcgowan>
Component: UI - OPSAssignee: Milan Zázrivec <mzazrivec>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Satyajit Bulage <sbulage>
Severity: medium Docs Contact: Red Hat CloudForms Documentation <cloudforms-docs>
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.11.0CC: bmidwood, dmetzger, hkataria, lavenel, mpovolny, mshriver, obarenbo
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: TestOnly, ZStream
Target Release: 5.12.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1788721 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-10-26 16:13:48 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: Bug
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: CFME Core Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1788721    

Description Peter McGowan 2019-11-21 12:15:31 UTC
Description of problem:
Editing an embedded Ansible machine credential does not show the defined username for that credential, just an empty field.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
CFME 5.11.0.28
Chrome 78 (Mac)

How reproducible:
Every time


Steps to Reproduce:
1. In Automation -> Ansible -> Credentials, create a new credential of type 'Machine'.
2. Give the new credential a name, and username value, and a password, and save this.
3. Now edit the new credential from Configuration -> Edit this credential. 

Actual results:
Observe that the 'Username' field is empty

Expected results:
The Username field should display the configured username for that credential.

Additional info:

Comment 3 Milan Zázrivec 2019-12-17 15:37:54 UTC
This is in fact the same bug as is described in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775093
although here it's manifested in a slightly different way.

This has been fixed in https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/6466

I'm moving this over to POST so that the bug can be properly verified.