Bug 1777634
Summary: | Retire mailman in Fedora 32+ | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Miro Hrončok <mhroncok> |
Component: | mailman | Assignee: | Pavel Zhukov <pzhukov> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 32 | CC: | cstratak, igor.raits, jkaluza, lbalhar, mhroncok, ngompa13, pviktori, pzhukov, redhat-bugzilla, thozza, zbyszek |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-03-03 14:41:31 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1625773, 1698500, 1708725 |
Description
Miro Hrončok
2019-11-28 01:04:04 UTC
*** Bug 1738082 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Pavel, did you continue with porting Mailman 2 to Python 3 as you mentioned in bug #1738082 comment #1? (In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #2) > Pavel, did you continue with porting Mailman 2 to Python 3 as you mentioned > in bug #1738082 comment #1? Yes, I work on it and work is progressing but slowly. There are quite few issues (one of them is the fact upstream supports mailman 3 which is python 3) so ported mailman 2 will be mostly fork :( I'm thinking about retiring original mailman in Fedora and introduce mailman2 package instead JFYI I am planning on retiring this package on Monday, 2020-01-06, if not already done by then. Request a FESCo exception by then (or report back the package is no longer depending on Python 2) if you wish to stop the procedure. Thanks (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #4) > JFYI I am planning on retiring this package on Monday, 2020-01-06, if not > already done by then. Request a FESCo exception by then (or report back the > package is no longer depending on Python 2) if you wish to stop the > procedure. Thanks Hi Miro. Please don't do it on Monday, I need more time to sync with Pavel, because he is on PTO until Monday and my understanding was that he asked for exception. No, he has not. I will hold the retirement then. Please, get back to me next week. Note that this is currently blocked via this exception request that will expire in 4 days https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2312 If there is no update in the exception request by the end of January, this package will be retired. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle. Changing version to 32. There is a FESCo exception: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2312 |