Bug 177967

Summary: lzo needs to be updated to 2.2
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot>
Component: lzoAssignee: Hans de Goede <hdegoede>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: extras-qa
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 2.02-2.fc6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-11-13 12:41:02 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 177974    
Attachments:
Description Flags
lzo-2.02-1 spec file. none

Description Nicolas Mailhot 2006-01-16 22:06:30 UTC
A new major version of lzo was released the 17 Oct 2005

It's supposed to be much better - the FE lzo package needs a refresh

Comment 1 Warren Togami 2006-01-17 18:44:14 UTC
Does this cause a so-name bump?  If so please be sure that you identify and
rebuild EVERYTHING that relies upon it before the packages are signed and pushed.


Comment 2 Nicolas Mailhot 2006-01-17 19:16:27 UTC
That's why doing it before the FC5 FE mass rebuild is better than doing it after it

Comment 3 Dams 2006-01-18 10:37:58 UTC
It's not a soname change. It's a filename change :
%{_libdir}/liblzo2.so
%{_libdir}/liblzo2.a

We now have liblzo2.

Do we create a new liblzo2 package ? liblzo and liblzo2 wouldnt conflict :
include files are in different path (%{includedir}/lzo*.h vs %{_includedir}/lzo)
and libs are different (liblzo.so vs liblzo2.so). 

Does everything can migrate easily to liblzo2 without pain ? (have to check "in
some other repository" also).
I got a working spec file for a liblzo-2.02 package.
Comments appreciated. 

Comment 4 Nicolas Mailhot 2006-01-18 10:50:46 UTC
please attach the spec so people can test-rebuild stuff

Comment 5 Dams 2006-01-19 09:28:15 UTC
Created attachment 123417 [details]
lzo-2.02-1 spec file.

I have to find out if the asm code on i386 wont make the package i686-only but
here it is.

Comment 6 Nicolas Mailhot 2006-01-19 20:25:48 UTC
lzop seems to build fine with this lzo version. I'll be able to update whenever
lzo 2 goes in. Thanks!

Comment 7 Hans de Goede 2006-11-13 12:41:02 UTC
I've taken over as maintainer of lzo quite some time and somehow have missed
this bug. lzo has already been at 2.02 for some time now, closing.