Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Review Request: tetex-lambda-jp|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk>|
|Status:||CLOSED CANTFIX||QA Contact:||Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2006-08-08 10:13:32 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Ryo Dairiki 2006-01-17 02:52:55 EST
Spec Name or Url: http://proxy.f2.ymdb.yahoofs.jp/users/d1e4801f/bc/tetex-lambda-jp/tetex-lambda-jp.spec?bc7gKzDB8tVlnzY8 SRPM Name or Url: http://proxy.f2.ymdb.yahoofs.jp/users/d1e4801f/bc/tetex-lambda-jp/tetex-lambda-jp-0-4.src.rpm?bc7gKzDB7WeN1Z6E Description: This package is addon packages for lambda(unicoded latex), which is included in the tetex package. We, Japanese need this package to write Japanese TeX document in UTF8. Without this package, we can't render Japanese gryphs properly. Note: This package has some description about dvipdfmx, which has not been included in Fedora Extras yet. This is because MATSUURA Takanori, who are going to be a member of Fedora Extras, will import that package later.
Comment 1 John Mahowald 2006-02-28 21:54:48 EST
Links to spec and srpm do not work. As to the description, I would avoid the we and use something like: This package contains addon packages for lambda(unicoded latex), which is included in the tetex package. This package is needed to render UTF8 Japanese glpyhs properly in TeX documents.
Comment 2 Ryo Dairiki 2006-02-28 22:26:58 EST
Okay, thanks. # I'm sorry for the downloads. New description: Omega/Lambda is an extended unicode TeX/LaTeX. This package adds the support for non-UTF-8 Japanese encodings such as ISO-2022-JP, Shift_JIS, and EUC-JP to lambda. SPEC: http://homepage2.nifty.com/shibatama/garage/tetex-lambda-jp.spec SRPM: http://homepage2.nifty.com/shibatama/garage/tetex-lambda-jp-0-4.src.rpm I think this package is needed much more brush up. (And I've found many bugs Orz...) I'm thinking pf remaking this package and posting here again. Should I change the status of this bug?
Comment 3 Chitlesh GOORAH 2006-06-08 17:03:25 EDT
The links to spec and srpm do not work.
Comment 4 Ryo Dairiki 2006-08-08 10:13:32 EDT
I'm sorry to say that but I'll close this package for now. (I hope I could re-add it later, but I have no time to rewrite it now) Thank you for your patience for reviewing it so long.