Bug 178003
Summary: | Review Request: tetex-lambda-jp | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk> |
Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-08-08 14:13:32 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 201449 |
Description
Ryo Dairiki
2006-01-17 07:52:55 UTC
Links to spec and srpm do not work. As to the description, I would avoid the we and use something like: This package contains addon packages for lambda(unicoded latex), which is included in the tetex package. This package is needed to render UTF8 Japanese glpyhs properly in TeX documents. Okay, thanks. # I'm sorry for the downloads. New description: Omega/Lambda is an extended unicode TeX/LaTeX. This package adds the support for non-UTF-8 Japanese encodings such as ISO-2022-JP, Shift_JIS, and EUC-JP to lambda. SPEC: http://homepage2.nifty.com/shibatama/garage/tetex-lambda-jp.spec SRPM: http://homepage2.nifty.com/shibatama/garage/tetex-lambda-jp-0-4.src.rpm I think this package is needed much more brush up. (And I've found many bugs Orz...) I'm thinking pf remaking this package and posting here again. Should I change the status of this bug? The links to spec and srpm do not work. I'm sorry to say that but I'll close this package for now. (I hope I could re-add it later, but I have no time to rewrite it now) Thank you for your patience for reviewing it so long. |