Bug 178051

Summary:	GPG always reports no signature
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Paul Gustitus <paul.gustitus>
Component:	up2date	Assignee:	Bret McMillan <bretm>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fanny Augustin <fmoquete>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	4	Keywords:	Security
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-11-05 16:18:22 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Paul Gustitus 2006-01-17 17:02:50 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5

Description of problem:
I did a complete reinstall of Fedora Core 4 from the DVD supplied in "Red Hat Fedora and Enterprise Linux Bible" from Wiley press (wiley.com).
part # 0555022447  DVD ID # MD02308A

During install it asked if I wanted to use GPG and update the key ring, I said yes.
EVERY package updated at the install and EVER SINCE gives the message "no GPG signature supplied".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
up2date-4.4.23-4

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install new Fedora Core 4
2.run up2date-4.4.23-4 or up2date-gnome-4.4.23-4
3.
  

Actual Results:  GPG fails on every package

Expected Results:  GPG should validate correctly
OR a new version of up2date should solve this problem

Additional info:

Comment 1 John Thacker 2006-10-29 20:19:32 UTC

up2date was replaced by pirut and put (package pirut) as of FC5.  Only FC5 and
FC6 are currently fully supported; FC3 and FC4 are supported for security fixes
only.  If this bug occurs in FC3 or FC4 and is a security bug, please change the
product to Fedora Extras and the version to match.  If you can verify that the
bug exists in RHEL as well, please change the product and version appropriately.

The codebase for pirut and pup is quite different, but if a similar bug exists
in pirut and pup in FC5 or FC6, please change the product to pirut and the
version appropriately and update the bug report.

We apologize that the bug was not fixed before now.  The status will be changed
to NEEDINFO, and if the bug is not updated with evidence that it is a security
bug or a bug that affects RHEL, it will be closed.

Comment 2 John Thacker 2006-11-05 16:18:22 UTC

Closing per previous message.