Bug 1781864

Summary:	libsecret-0.19.1-1 weak dependency on gnome-keyring installing X packages in minimal installs
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	louisgtwo
Component:	libsecret	Assignee:	Kalev Lember <klember>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	31	CC:	debarshir, klember, stefw, thomas.moschny
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	libsecret-0.20.2-2.fc32	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-04-08 02:53:46 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description louisgtwo 2019-12-10 18:09:08 UTC

libsecret weak dependency on gnome-keyring installs X libraries. Installing minimal fedora installs gnupg2 which has a weak dependency on pinentry. Pinentry requires libsecret-1.so.0()(64bit). Installing gnome-keyring installs a bunch of X libs that I do not want on a minimal fedora install.

Comment 1 Kalev Lember 2019-12-10 20:31:25 UTC

Can you turn off weak deps when installing the minimal system?

Comment 2 louisgtwo 2019-12-10 21:15:47 UTC

I install my servers with a usb stick. How do you turn off weak deps in anaconda?

Comment 3 Kalev Lember 2019-12-11 09:26:03 UTC

Not sure if it's possible in anaconda. I know it's possible to disable weak dependencies in kickstart.

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725412 for the background why we added the weak dependency.

Comment 4 louisgtwo 2019-12-11 14:29:07 UTC

Yes I created a kickstart file with --excludeWeakdeps and it worked well. But my point is users picking minimal install from anaconda expect the smallest install possible. Maybe this is an issue for anaconda and setting --excludeWeakdeps by default for minimal installs.

Comment 5 Kalev Lember 2019-12-11 20:15:17 UTC

Yes, not sure what the right fix would be.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2020-04-06 21:19:43 UTC

FEDORA-2020-bec4522056 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bec4522056

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2020-04-07 02:28:15 UTC

FEDORA-2020-bec4522056 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-bec4522056`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bec4522056

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2020-04-08 02:53:46 UTC

FEDORA-2020-bec4522056 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.