Bug 1782655
Summary: | Package source is from wrong version | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Armando Biagioni Neto <abiagion> |
Component: | python-astroid | Assignee: | Gwyn Ciesla <gwync> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 31 | CC: | dmoluguw, gwync, orion, philip.wyett |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | python-astroid-2.3.3-2.gitace7b29.fc31 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-01-05 00:40:13 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Armando Biagioni Neto
2019-12-12 03:06:48 UTC
This was done to correct build issues with Python 3.8 under https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1717653 The simplest solution is simply to update to 2.3.3, is that acceptable? I believe an update to 2.3.3 is reasonable given that Python 3.8 requires that. However, having a "final" release of 2.2.5 would be beneficial while we wait for astroid's developers to fix the issue I mentioned. This way we can force our CIs to use 2.2.5 for now and people not affect by that can use the latest 2.3.3 release. Is that possible? You could specify 2.2.5-2, that should be the canonical 2.2.5. So should I move to 2.3.3 on f31 or no? > You could specify 2.2.5-2, that should be the canonical 2.2.5. You mean installing 2.2.5-2 from outside the main repositories? That release is not available for fedora 31. This is why I suggested a "final" 2.2.5 release before updating it to 2.3.3. > So should I move to 2.3.3 on f31 or no? I think so, that would fix the version mismatch. Ok, I'll get that out ASAP. Any opinion on having a final 2.2.5 to make that available on the main repos? No, that's what 2.2.5-2 was. Making some noise to check if there are any updates :-) Currently, PKI's CI is indirectly blocked: https://github.com/dogtagpki/pki/pull/303 I built it and forgot to submit an update. Thank you! Thanks for the update! :-) python-astroid-2.3.3-2.gitace7b29.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-46da95e0f7 FEDORA-2019-46da95e0f7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-46da95e0f7 python-astroid-2.3.3-2.gitace7b29.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |